qa-automation-mcp-plugin
Related Servers
Alternatives to qa-automation-mcp-plugin
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA universal browser automation MCP server using Playwright, enabling programmatic control of Chrome with 63 tools for navigation, interaction, media control, and CDP-based diagnostics.6311 npm3MIT

AWARSEofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceSelf-healing browser automation MCP server integrating Playwright with LLM-assisted locator repair.61MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to automate browser testing via Chromium, providing tools for navigation, interaction, and inspection.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceUnified MCP server for browser automation (Playwright + CDP + CLI) and bookmark management across Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Brave, including cross-browser sync, deduplication, and a React dashboard.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server for AI browser automation. Connects to your own Chromium instance via CDP, providing tools for browser control, navigation, interaction, and content extraction.191MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for autonomous end-to-end testing with Wopee.io. Analyzes web applications, generates and executes Playwright-based functional tests, and validates results — all driven by natural language commands.15230 npm5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, especially the vtable_* family which is subdivided by action (get, scan, scroll, select, drag). A few pairs like vtable_analyze_headers and vtable_scan_columns overlap in analyzing headers, but descriptions clarify their different outputs. Overall, agents can tell tools apart with careful reading.
Tools generally follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., click_interact, fill_input, capture_screenshot). The vtable_* prefix creates a consistent subsystem, though 'mimo_describe_image' breaks the pattern by leading with a noun and 'execute_and_record' uses a conjunction while 'execute_action_chain' uses a modifier. Still, the overall pattern is predictable.
With 24 tools, this is on the heavy side, but the breadth reflects the complexity of QA automation including full VTable support. Each tool serves a distinct function, and the count is justified by the domain, though it demands careful selection.
The server covers the full recording lifecycle (start, execute, export), generic interaction (click, fill, chain, wait), page analysis, and a deep VTable toolkit. Minor gaps include no dedicated hover, keyboard shortcut, or element state assertion, but these are workarounds via execute_action_chain and wait_for_condition.