选择日期

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reveals the operational sequence: real-click the input to open the portal calendar, then click the target date. It does not mention error scenarios or side effects, but the non-read-only annotation and click description provide reasonable transparency for a simple action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that directly states the tool's function without unnecessary words or repetition. It is well-structured and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple click-based date selection tool, the description sufficiently explains the core behavior. It omits return-value details, but given the full schema coverage and low complexity, the overall context is adequately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter descriptions in the schema are complete (100% coverage) with clear details for date format, timeout, and how to obtain element_id. The main description adds no extra parameter information, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action: it operates an AntD DatePicker by clicking the input to open the calendar and then clicking the target date. This makes the tool's purpose unambiguous and distinguishes it from other AntD interaction tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description identifies the target component (AntD DatePicker) but does not explicitly compare with sibling tools or state when to choose this tool over alternatives. The use case is implied rather than explicitly guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.