Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to idios

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely execute peer-to-peer tasks on the XRP Ledger by locking payment in escrow, submitting proof of completion, and receiving an objective PASS/FAIL judgement from an independent AI referee.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Settlement rails for AI labor — USDC escrow on Base Mainnet, 1% protocol fee, designed for autonomous agents. 10 MCP tools covering the full escrow lifecycle: * Quoting calldata for create-intent, submit-proof, release-funds (broadcast gated) * Single-call x402 payment binding (replaces the 5-step x402 dance with one HMAC-signed POST) * Server-side reputation from on-chain event scan * Li
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Non-custodial on-chain escrow + AI arbitration for agent-to-agent USDC payments on Base. Seven tools wrap a verified EscrowV1 contract — create, deliver, confirm, dispute, resolve — with read-only introspection if no wallet key is provided.
      7
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Agent trust checks, reputation and signed passports. Glama's build is a separate local Guild with an empty graph and its own issuer. Registrations and evidence stay local. Use the remote MCP connector for the shared hosted Guild; its free preflight and metered trust services are separate.
      43
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct contract lifecycle action or query, and the descriptions are highly specific, making misselection unlikely. A few pairs share similar name prefixes (claim_funds vs claim_after_timeout, the void_* tools) but their conditions and roles are clearly delineated.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The tool names mix verb_noun (create_contract_b, view_contract, claim_funds) with noun_verb (worker_register, worker_deregister, worker_reclaim, treasury_sweep) and a few irregulars (mutual_cancel, claim_after_timeout, void_claim_requester). This inconsistency makes it harder to predict tool names.

    Tool Count3/5

    26 tools is on the heavy side, somewhat above the typical 3-15 range, but the broad scope (contract lifecycle, dispute resolution, worker bonds, marketplace discovery) justifies most of them. It feels slightly over-scoped but still manageable.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full escrow lifecycle: create, commit, deliver, approve, dispute, claim, refund, void, plus worker bond registration/reclaim and marketplace discovery. Minor gaps include no way to list a user's contracts or cancel an Open contract before expiry, but these can be worked around by tracking job IDs or waiting for expiry.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive