Homespun
Related Servers
Alternatives to Homespun
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceHand a human a rich interactive UI by URL from any MCP client and get structured data back — forms, approvals, surveys, pickers, editable lists. Round-trip human-in-the-loop for agents.262 npm7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to render interactive user interfaces such as forms, dashboards, charts, tables, and wizards directly in MCP-compatible clients. Supports structured data collection and richer interactions beyond text responses.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to ask users questions through rich, browser-rendered HTML forms and receive structured answers, supporting approvals, choices, free-text, and form inputs.26 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to serve interactive Auth0 Forms as MCP Apps in a sandboxed iframe, letting users complete sign-up, consent, profile, or payment flows while the agent only receives completion status.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that lets agents create, display, and export rich UI widgets (cards, dashboards, charts, forms) inline in conversations, with interactive iframe support in MCP Apps hosts and PNG image fallback for other clients.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to present replies as interactive, validated UI trees rendered as MCP Apps—such as checklists and data grids—without requiring another LLM call.4 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the Homespun platform, such as app lifecycle, data operations, community management, and system settings. The detailed descriptions and action enums within tools further clarify boundaries, leaving no ambiguity about which tool to use for a given task.
Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern, predominantly using verb_noun (e.g., deploy_app, list_rows) or simple nouns that clearly indicate their domain (e.g., apps, grants, members). This predictability aids agent selection and reduces confusion.
With 19 tools, the count is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but remains well-scoped for the platform's breadth. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the count does not feel excessive given the coverage of app management, CRUD, community features, and system utilities.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle of apps (create, deploy, manage, delete), data operations (CRUD, change feed), membership, ingest, attachments, community publishing, and agent management. No obvious gaps are present for the intended domain.