Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Homespun

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to render interactive user interfaces such as forms, dashboards, charts, tables, and wizards directly in MCP-compatible clients. Supports structured data collection and richer interactions beyond text responses.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to ask users questions through rich, browser-rendered HTML forms and receive structured answers, supporting approvals, choices, free-text, and form inputs.
      26 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to serve interactive Auth0 Forms as MCP Apps in a sandboxed iframe, letting users complete sign-up, consent, profile, or payment flows while the agent only receives completion status.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets agents create, display, and export rich UI widgets (cards, dashboards, charts, forms) inline in conversations, with interactive iframe support in MCP Apps hosts and PNG image fallback for other clients.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to present replies as interactive, validated UI trees rendered as MCP Apps—such as checklists and data grids—without requiring another LLM call.
      4 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the Homespun platform, such as app lifecycle, data operations, community management, and system settings. The detailed descriptions and action enums within tools further clarify boundaries, leaving no ambiguity about which tool to use for a given task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern, predominantly using verb_noun (e.g., deploy_app, list_rows) or simple nouns that clearly indicate their domain (e.g., apps, grants, members). This predictability aids agent selection and reduces confusion.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 19 tools, the count is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but remains well-scoped for the platform's breadth. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the count does not feel excessive given the coverage of app management, CRUD, community features, and system utilities.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle of apps (create, deploy, manage, delete), data operations (CRUD, change feed), membership, ingest, attachments, community publishing, and agent management. No obvious gaps are present for the intended domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues