Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
holocode-ai

Rembg MCP Server

by holocode-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Rembg MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • LassoCut MCP

      jaupin94
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to remove image backgrounds from individual files, folders, or URLs and save processed results with options for preview or full-size output, background color, format, and cropping while handling account sign-in and credit checks.
      117 npm
      MIT

    • ai-image-router-mcp

      MarcinWolnyEU
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables generating images, animating stills or generating video from prompts through OpenRouter, Mistral, Eden AI and fal.ai via direct REST calls, with async job polling, reference images, palettes, exclusions and per-model options. Also performs local background removal, animated GIF assembly, cropping, format conversion, resizing, and single- or multi-size Windows ICO icon set building and unpacking.
      42 npm
      MIT

    • fapihub-mcp

      Firdavs-coder
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to edit images on local disk by removing, blurring, or replacing backgrounds with solid colors or gradients, generating subject masks, and adding drop shadows. Also exposes a free usage tool so agents can check plan limits and remaining quota before running large batches.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one processes a single image, the other processes all images in a folder. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools share the prefix 'rembg-' but use different suffixes ('-i' and '-p'). The pattern is somewhat consistent, but the suffixes are not fully explanatory without context.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server is minimal but covers the basic use cases. The scope is narrow, so the count is borderline appropriate, but lacks additional options like different models or output formats.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers single and batch background removal, which are the core operations. However, it lacks other potentially useful features like processing remote URLs, preview, or customizing output, leaving minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources