Pokédex MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| fetch_pokemonC | Fetch detailed information about a Pokémon by name or ID |
| get_type_effectivenessC | Get type effectiveness information including strengths, weaknesses, and resistances |
| get_pokemon_encountersC | Get location encounter information for a Pokémon |
| search_pokemonC | Search for Pokémon by partial name match |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools have mostly distinct purposes: fetch_pokemon retrieves detailed info, get_pokemon_encounters focuses on locations, get_type_effectiveness handles type interactions, and search_pokemon enables partial name matching. However, fetch_pokemon and search_pokemon could be slightly confused as both involve Pokémon lookup, but their descriptions clarify the distinction between exact and partial matching.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case, using clear verbs like 'fetch', 'get', and 'search' paired with descriptive nouns. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and readable.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a Pokédex server, covering core functionalities like info retrieval, location data, type analysis, and search. It is slightly lean but well-scoped, as each tool serves a distinct purpose without obvious bloat.
The tools cover key aspects such as fetching details, encounters, type effectiveness, and searching, but there are notable gaps. For a Pokédex domain, missing operations like listing Pokémon by generation, evolution chains, or abilities limit coverage, though agents can work around this with the existing tools.