capacity-attest
Related Servers
Alternatives to capacity-attest
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceOn-chain delivery receipts for x402 AI-agent payments on Solana: anchors SHA-256 digests of delivered content to a PDA after settlement; buyers verify proof of delivery offline with zero trust in the seller. Live MCP endpoint + npm bridge.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables auditing x402 payment logs against delivery logs to issue signed proof-of-delivery receipts and verify payer spend health.-
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceMCP services for agent security preflight, source scanning, injection screening, proof-of-work policy rehearsal, carbon accounting, climate disclosure and regulatory monitoring. Use each hosted endpoint in the README. Inspect a free quote before buyer-authorized x402/USDC payment. Includes free trust and settlement tools. Maxwell rehearsal does not activate runtime protection.220Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create cryptographically verifiable receipts of their delegated work, with capabilities for multi-party approval and offline verification.1129 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to validate deliverables (JSON, ZIP, PDF, DOCX) against signed contracts, generating verifiable receipts with Ed25519 signatures.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query a public signed ledger of known failures and fixes before retrying, then ingest, confirm, fail, and share dense claims so subsequent agents avoid paying the same cost.29326 PyPI3Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools split cleanly along write/read-ledger/read-identity lines: record_delivery writes a signed claim, get_delivery_history reads the local ledger for a seller, and resolve_agent_identity performs an on-chain ERC-8004 lookup. Names and descriptions make the boundary between the two read tools explicit (delivery claims vs. identity registration), so there is no realistic misselection risk.
All three names are snake_case verb_noun (record_delivery, get_delivery_history, resolve_agent_identity), with the verb form matching the operation type (record for mutation, get/resolve for reads). No mixed casing or stylistic drift.
Three tools is at the low end but each maps to a genuinely distinct capability in a narrow attestation domain, so nothing feels padded or redundant. It is slightly thin — a single-claim fetch would round it out — but the scope is defensible.
There is write, list, and identity resolution, but no way to fetch a single claim by claimId, filter by resource type/buyer, or traverse chains server-side; the description instead tells the caller to recompute completeness locally via analyzeCompleteness(). An agent can work around this by pulling all history, but notable operational gaps remain for a ledger-oriented server.