Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to capacity-attest

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      On-chain delivery receipts for x402 AI-agent payments on Solana: anchors SHA-256 digests of delivered content to a PDA after settlement; buyers verify proof of delivery offline with zero trust in the seller. Live MCP endpoint + npm bridge.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP services for agent security preflight, source scanning, injection screening, proof-of-work policy rehearsal, carbon accounting, climate disclosure and regulatory monitoring. Use each hosted endpoint in the README. Inspect a free quote before buyer-authorized x402/USDC payment. Includes free trust and settlement tools. Maxwell rehearsal does not activate runtime protection.
      220
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create cryptographically verifiable receipts of their delegated work, with capabilities for multi-party approval and offline verification.
      11
      29 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to validate deliverables (JSON, ZIP, PDF, DOCX) against signed contracts, generating verifiable receipts with Ed25519 signatures.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query a public signed ledger of known failures and fixes before retrying, then ingest, confirm, fail, and share dense claims so subsequent agents avoid paying the same cost.
      29
      326 PyPI
      3
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools split cleanly along write/read-ledger/read-identity lines: record_delivery writes a signed claim, get_delivery_history reads the local ledger for a seller, and resolve_agent_identity performs an on-chain ERC-8004 lookup. Names and descriptions make the boundary between the two read tools explicit (delivery claims vs. identity registration), so there is no realistic misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three names are snake_case verb_noun (record_delivery, get_delivery_history, resolve_agent_identity), with the verb form matching the operation type (record for mutation, get/resolve for reads). No mixed casing or stylistic drift.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is at the low end but each maps to a genuinely distinct capability in a narrow attestation domain, so nothing feels padded or redundant. It is slightly thin — a single-claim fetch would round it out — but the scope is defensible.

    Completeness3/5

    There is write, list, and identity resolution, but no way to fetch a single claim by claimId, filter by resource type/buyer, or traverse chains server-side; the description instead tells the caller to recompute completeness locally via analyzeCompleteness(). An agent can work around this by pulling all history, but notable operational gaps remain for a ledger-oriented server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues