Agent Receipt Verify
Related Servers
Alternatives to Agent Receipt Verify
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceRuns the MCP initialize handshake and validates tools/list JSON schemas on any public MCP server, and inspects x402 payment endpoints. Ships as a stdio MCP server the agent calls directly, plus a CLI and a GitHub Action. Read-only, no API key needed.657 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that tests agent payment capabilities by making a real x402 payment ($10 USDC on Base) and returning a signed diagnostic report covering the entire payment flow.MIT

ScrapeCheck MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that verifies scraped web data by re-fetching source pages and returning ed25519-signed pass, fail, or unverifiable verdicts, with x402 in-band payment.3MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the Hosannaith x402 reliability oracle on Algorand. Gives any agent a tool to score an x402 endpoint's reliability — uptime, correct HTTP 402 behaviour and latency — before paying it.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for verifying agent payment integrity on x402, providing tools to check payTo mismatches, market stats, and lookup endpoints.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for agent-native and human-accessible payments using MPP and x402 protocols, enabling payment flows from CLI or agent hosts.11 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools occupy strictly non-overlapping phases: one runs before payment (read-only conformance probing, never pays), the other runs after payment (links a signed receipt to an on-chain settlement). Descriptions explicitly state the temporal ordering and the distinct inputs/outputs, so misselection is essentially impossible.
Both names are snake_case and action-first (check_…, link_…), giving a readable, predictable pattern. The prefixes and noun styles differ ('x402_endpoint' vs 'receipt_to_settlement'), but this reflects genuinely different operations rather than sloppy convention.
Two tools is on the thin side, but the domain — verifying x402 offer-receipts before and after payment — is narrow and the pair maps cleanly onto its two lifecycle checkpoints. Nothing in the surface feels redundant or padded.
The before-pay and after-pay verification paths are both covered, with explicit tri-state answers (linked / not linked / could-not-check) avoiding dead ends. Minor gaps remain: no way to inspect or list previously verified receipts, and no batch or summary operation for multiple endpoints.