Skip to main content
Glama
holistis

3ilm-mcp

by holistis
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to 3ilm-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • claudit

      marchev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching over 20,000+ smart contract audit findings from Solodit, with filters for severity, firm, tags, and more. Designed for use with AI coding agents like Claude Code and Codex CLI.
      4
      14 npm
      158
      MIT
    • Elytra Security MCP Server by ElytraSec

      Elytra Security MCP Serverofficial

      ElytraSec
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to scan smart contracts and code for vulnerabilities, check against 12 famous-hack patterns, and return public security receipts directly in the IDE.
      4
      19 npm
      MIT

    • solidit-mcp-server

      HBlackfoxx
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to Solodit's 49,000+ blockchain vulnerability database, enabling search, browse, and lookup of audit findings directly from your AI workflow.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools appear distinct: search_vulnerabilities focuses on finding vulnerabilities, list_patterns enumerates patterns, and get_pattern_details retrieves specifics for a single pattern. Minor ambiguity exists as 'patterns' could relate to vulnerabilities, but the action verbs (search/list/get) clarify intent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names follow the snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_vulnerabilities, get_pattern_details, list_patterns. The verb (search/get/list) and noun (vulnerabilities/pattern) placement is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is within the well-scoped range (3-15) and fits a focused read-only knowledge base for vulnerabilities and patterns. Each tool serves a distinct purpose without unnecessary redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers search, list, and get-details operations, which covers typical read-only workflows. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated 'get_vulnerability_details' tool, but search_vulnerabilities may return sufficient details to compensate.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources