Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to stacksfinder-mcp

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Anthropic's github MCP server, but better. Support for more endpoints. Including releases and tags, pull request reviews, statuses, rate limit, gists, projects, packages, and even pull request diffs. Indented to be used with MissionSquad's MCP API for secret management (aka your access token).
    45
    573 npm
    10
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that fetches up-to-date, version-specific documentation and code examples from libraries directly into LLM prompts, helping developers get accurate answers without outdated or hallucinated information.
    2
    1,132,952 npm
    61,901
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Vendor sovereignty scanner for EU AI Act compliance. Scans provider stacks for CLOUD Act exposure, data residency, and GDPR DPA status across 55 providers, then suggests EU-native alternatives. Free, no account required.
    7 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Discovery layer between AI coding agents and 3,100+ developer tools. Search, compare, and get integration code for auth, payments, analytics, email, databases, and 25 other categories — so agents recommend existing tools instead of generating boilerplate.
    24
    56 PyPI
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Live tech-hiring intelligence for AI agents. Search 130K+ open jobs collected daily from ~500 tech companies' own career sites — plus company hiring profiles, tech stacks, salary benchmarks, and skill trends. Five tools work with no account.
    31
    174 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, such as analyze_tech for detailed analysis, compare_techs for comparisons, and create_blueprint for generating stacks. However, recommend_stack and recommend_stack_demo overlap in functionality, with the demo version being a limited free alternative, which could cause confusion for agents about which to use in different contexts.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures, such as analyze_tech, compare_techs, create_blueprint, and list_technologies. This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy for agents to navigate without naming conflicts.

Tool Count5/5

With 10 tools, the count is well-scoped for a tech stack recommendation server, covering key operations like analysis, comparison, blueprint creation, and API management. Each tool serves a specific role without redundancy, fitting the domain's complexity appropriately.

Completeness4/5

The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for tech stack evaluation, including analysis, comparison, recommendation, and blueprint management. A minor gap exists in update or delete operations for blueprints or API keys, but core workflows are fully supported, allowing agents to perform essential tasks effectively.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues