docs_create_document

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the file lands in My Drive root and specifies the return JSON fields (document_id, title, url), which adds value beyond the annotations. It describes a mutating operation consistent with readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. No contradiction with annotations exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, front-loaded with the core action, and contains no filler. The location and return information are in clear, separate statements that earn their place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter create operation, the description covers the core action, the resulting location, and the return format. It does not discuss error conditions or permissions, but the annotations and output schema cover the remaining safety and output expectations. It is mostly complete for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Per the context signal, schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for parameter meaning. It clarifies that initial_content is optional plain text, but it does not explain the required title parameter beyond the tool's general purpose. Parameter semantics are mostly left to inference.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Create') and resource ('Google Doc'), and notes the optional initial plain-text content. It is easy to distinguish from sibling tools that read, append, replace, or create spreadsheets. The return section further clarifies what the tool produces.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives context that a new file lands in the account's My Drive root, which helps an agent understand the side effect. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use this tool or name alternatives such as sheets_create_spreadsheet. Usage is implied rather than directly guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.