Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to EDI 834 MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local inspection of synthetic ACH files by parsing fixed-width records, validating structure and control totals, explaining findings, masking sensitive fields, repairing derived controls, and generating deterministic test files. All work happens on-device with no bank or network transmission.
      10
      102 PyPI
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Let AI agents read, validate and acknowledge EDI documents. Parses raw X12 and EDIFACT interchanges into structured JSON, validates envelope integrity, produces plain-language summaries, and generates 997 Functional Acknowledgments.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to parse, validate, summarize, and convert X12 EDI documents (such as 850 purchase orders and 810 invoices) into structured JSON through callable MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to explain, scrub and check ISO 20022 payment messages and SSI files entirely on the local machine, including CBPR+ readiness hints, lifecycle triage, IBAN/BIC validation and payment-vs-SSI checks against the user's own licensed reference data. Runs as a local stdio MCP server with no network calls, telemetry or bundled vendor data.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: validation, summarization, comparison, code explanation, setup guidance, service selection, and baseline profile inspection. The Workday-related tools are complementary rather than overlapping, so an agent can select the right one without confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a readable snake_case verb_noun pattern, often with the 834 domain marker. The main deviation is workday_834_setup_guide, which is noun-led rather than verb-led, but overall the naming remains predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for an EDI 834 validation and Workday setup assistant. Each tool covers a meaningful workflow step without redundant or filler operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core validation, inspection, comparison, code lookup, and Workday setup guidance well. A minor gap is profile management: agents can inspect default settings and pass profiles, but there is no tool to create, list, or edit carrier profiles.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues