Coding Prompt Engineer MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANTHROPIC_API_KEY | Yes | Your Anthropic API key to use Claude for formatting |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| rewrite_coding_promptC | Rewrites user's coding prompts before passing to AI IDE (e.g. Cursor AI) to get the best results from AI IDE. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.
A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The naming follows a clear verb_noun pattern.
A single tool is too few for a server with a broad purpose like 'Coding Prompt Engineer,' which suggests potential for multiple operations such as analyzing, optimizing, or testing prompts. This minimal set feels incomplete and under-scoped.
The server's domain implies handling coding prompts, but the single rewrite tool leaves significant gaps. Missing operations might include validating prompts, generating examples, or providing feedback, making the surface severely incomplete for the stated purpose.