plan_oauth_wait

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions finishing a pending login after user approval but doesn't disclose mutation behavior, error conditions, or return values. More detail needed for a tool involving network calls and user interaction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise and to the point, but lack of parameter details reduces effectiveness. Could be slightly longer to cover essentials.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given moderate complexity (OAuth flow, user interaction) and no annotations or output schema, the description is insufficient. Missing parameter explanation, success/failure behavior, and prerequisites.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and description does not mention the timeout_ms parameter. No additional meaning beyond schema constraints. Parameter purpose and usage entirely unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool completes a pending OAuth login after user approval, using specific verb 'Finish' and resource 'pending plan_oauth_login'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like plan_oauth_login and plan_oauth_logout.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (after plan_oauth_login with wait=false and user approval) but lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternative guidance. The sibling tool list provides context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.