Skip to main content
Glama

dossier_headers

Fetch HTTP response headers from any public domain and audit them for missing or misconfigured security headers, including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy. Get a clear report of each header's presence and value.

Instructions

Fetch https:/// and return all HTTP response headers, with an audit highlighting missing or misconfigured security headers. Use to review CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy; for redirect tracing use dossier_redirects instead. Single GET via fetch, 5 s timeout, captures raw response headers before any redirect is followed. Returns a CheckResult: on success, {status:"ok", headers:{...}, securityAudit:[{header, present, value},...]}; on failure, {status:"error", reason}.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYesPublic FQDN, e.g. example.com. Must be resolvable on the public internet; IPs, ports, paths, and protocol prefixes are rejected.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses HTTP GET, 5s timeout, capturing headers before redirects, and the CheckResult output format. No annotations provided, so description fully handles transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with no wasted words: purpose, usage guidelines, then technical details. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description fully explains the return structure and covers all relevant aspects for a single-parameter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and description adds no extra parameter info beyond schema, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches HTTP headers and provides a security audit, distinguishing it from the sibling dossier_redirects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use (to review specific security headers) and when not to (for redirect tracing, use dossier_redirects instead), providing clear alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hikmahtech/drwhome'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server