Skip to main content
Glama
higebu

cml2-mcp

by higebu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to cml2-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cml-mcp-server

      jonathanLynn
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) that enables building, managing, and running network labs through MCP tools, wrapping the CML Python SDK for lab/topology CRUD, node/link management, and configuration.
      22
      -

    • mcp-openapi-schema

      hannesj
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A MCP server that exposes OpenAPI schema information to LLMs like Claude. This server allows an LLM to explore and understand large OpenAPI schemas through a set of specialized tools, without needing to load the whole schema into the context
      48 npm
      49
      MIT

    • data-mcp

      Tattzy25
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server generated from an OpenAPI Specification, exposing tools via HTTP. It allows clients to invoke API operations using JSON-RPC 2.0 requests.
      4 npm
      Artistic 2.0

    • mcpwrap

      m4cd4r4
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that wraps any REST API with an OpenAPI spec, dynamically creating MCP tools at runtime without code generation.
      7 npm
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: cml_api makes arbitrary REST calls to the CML2 API, while cml_openapi fetches the OpenAPI specification. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use the consistent prefix 'cml_' followed by a descriptive snake_case name ('api' and 'openapi'), following a clear pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server is extremely minimal for what appears to be a full API wrapper. Most use cases would require the user to manually parse the OpenAPI spec and craft REST calls, making the tool set feel incomplete.

    Completeness2/5

    The server provides only a low-level API call tool and a spec fetcher, lacking any higher-level operations (e.g., CRUD for labs, devices, etc.). Users must implement all logic themselves, which is a significant gap for a CML2 integration.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources