Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentWallet MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Self-hosted wallet MCP server for AI agents. Provides 42 tools for multi-chain crypto operations: transfers, token management, DeFi (swap, lend, stake, bridge, perp), NFT, smart contracts, and x402 payments. Supports EVM and Solana with policy engine, spending limits, and human approval.
      60
      29
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access Solana wallet analytics, token data, and DeFi tools via pay-per-request USDC micropayments using the x402 protocol, without API keys or subscriptions.
      13
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read chain data, execute transactions, swap tokens, and manage wallets on Solana through 38 tools across 7 modules. Supports write operations with a private key and includes built-in prompts for common workflows.
      38
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several overlapping tools exist: sign_transaction/send_transaction/simulate_transaction, transfer/transfer_token, and pay_x402/quote_x402/discover_x402 have intertwined purposes. Descriptions do provide strong guidance, but the boundaries still require careful reading and misselection is plausible.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Mostly consistent verb_noun snake_case (list_wallets, get_balance, create_paywall), with only minor deviations like check_approval and spend_policy that are still readable. No mixing of camelCase or chaotic patterns.

    Tool Count2/5

    40 tools is heavy for the server's apparent scope, packing wallet management, DeFi helpers, x402 payments, paywalls, and ledger tooling into one surface. This likely forces agents to scan a large registry and increases the chance of poor tool selection.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad and lifecycle-rich: wallet CRUD, transfers, approvals, paywalls, payments, policy, receipts, and custody reporting are all present. Only minor gaps exist, such as no explicit update_wallet for labels/limits and no transaction history listing for broadcasted sends outside the ledger view.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow