phantom-touch
Related Servers
Alternatives to phantom-touch
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server to control iOS simulators for automation, enabling device management, input control, and screen capture via Facebook IDB.11MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for reliable iOS Simulator automation that enables agents to control devices, read accessibility UI trees, and capture screenshots. It supports deterministic grounded actions like tapping, typing, and swiping to create a closed-loop observe-reason-act cycle.152 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server to control iOS Simulators.8 npm53MIT

SilbercueSwiftofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceHigh-performance MCP server for iOS development and test automation. Gives AI coding assistants direct access to iOS simulators with sub-20ms screenshots, UI interaction, building, testing, and an intelligent operator mode.8MIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets an AI agent drive the iOS Simulator in a loop, enabling tapping, typing, swiping, reading the screen via the accessibility tree, and verifying app state.14MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for iOS Simulator automation. Enables AI assistants to visually interact with iOS apps running in the simulator.22 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., pt_launch_app vs pt_list_apps). However, pt_type_text and pt_fill_input both handle text input, and pt_list_elements vs pt_list_inputs have some overlap, though descriptions clarify their specific use cases.
All tools consistently use the pt_ prefix with verb_noun snake_case naming (e.g., pt_boot_simulator, pt_get_clipboard, pt_list_inputs). The pattern is predictable and uniform across the entire set.
18 tools is on the higher end for simulator automation, but each tool covers a distinct operation (simulator control, app management, interaction, input). The count feels slightly heavy yet justified for the comprehensive feature set.
The server covers core simulator workflows: controlling simulators, launching apps, UI interaction, text input, and screen inspection. Missing features like device orientation or push notification simulation, but these are secondary and do not block primary automation tasks.