Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server
This server provides US weather data: alerts and forecasts.
get-alerts: Retrieve weather alerts for a US state by providing a two-letter state code (e.g., CA, NY).
get-forecast: Retrieve a weather forecast for a US location by providing latitude and longitude coordinates.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Model Context Protocol (MCP) Serverconfigure a new OpenAI model with gpt-4o-mini"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Simple MCP Client to Explore MCP Servers

Quickly test and explore MCP servers from the command line!
Project Status
This utility is based on
langchain-mcp-tools,
which currently supports MCP Protocol version 2025-03-26.
It does not support the MCP 2026-07-28 specification.
Related MCP server: Just Prompt
Introduction
A simple, text-based CLI client for Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers built with LangChain and Python.
Suitable for testing MCP servers, exploring their capabilities, and prototyping integrations.
Internally it uses LangChain Agent and
a utility function convert_mcp_to_langchain_tools() from langchain_mcp_tools.
A TypeScript equivalent of this utility is available here
Prerequisites
Python 3.11+
[optional]
uv(uvx) installed to run Python package-based local MCP servers[optional] npm 7+ (
npx) to run Node.js package-based local MCP serversLLM API key(s) from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI Studio (for GenAI/Gemini), xAI, Cerebras, and/or Groq, as needed
Quick Start
Install
mcp-chattool. This can take up to a few minutes to complete:pip install mcp-chatConfigure LLM and MCP Servers settings via the configuration file,
llm_mcp_config.json5code llm_mcp_config.json5The following is a simple configuration for quick testing:
{ "llm": { "provider": "openai", "model": "gpt-5.4-mini" // "provider": "anthropic", "model": "claude-haiku-4-5" // "provider": "google_genai", "model": "gemini-2.5-flash" // "provider": "xai", "model": "grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning" // "provider": "cerebras", "model": "gpt-oss-120b" // "provider": "groq", "model": "openai/gpt-oss-20b" }, "mcp_servers": { "us-weather": { // US weather only "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@h1deya/mcp-server-weather"] }, }, "example_queries": [ "Tell me how LLMs work in a few sentences", "Are there any weather alerts in California?", ], }Set up API keys
echo "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-proj-... GOOGLE_API_KEY=AI... XAI_API_KEY=xai-... CEREBRAS_API_KEY=csk-... GROQ_API_KEY=gsk_..." > .env code .envRun the tool
mcp-chatBy default, it reads the configuration file,
llm_mcp_config.json5, from the current directory.
Then, it applies the environment variables specified in the.envfile, as well as the ones that are already defined.
Features
Easy setup: Works out of the box with popular MCP servers
Flexible configuration: JSON5 config with environment variable support
Multiple LLM/API providers: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google (GenAI), xAI, Ceberas, Groq
Command & URL servers: Support for both local and remote MCP servers
Local MCP Server logging: Save stdio MCP server logs with customizable log directory
Interactive testing: Example queries for the convenience of repeated testing
Limitations
Tool Return Types: Currently, only text results of tool calls are supported. It uses LangChain's
response_format: 'content'(the default) internally, which only supports text strings. While MCP tools can return multiple content types (text, images, etc.), this library currently filters and uses only text content.MCP Features: Only MCP Tools are supported. Other MCP features like Resources, Prompts, and Sampling are not implemented.
Usage
Basic Usage
mcp-chatBy default, it reads the configuration file, llm_mcp_config.json5, from the current directory.
Then, it applies the environment variables specified in the .env file,
as well as the ones that are already defined.
It outputs local MCP server logs to the current directory.
With Options
# Specify the config file to use
mcp-chat --config my-config.json5
# Store local (stdio) MCP server logs in specific directory
mcp-chat --log-dir ./logs
# Enable verbose logging
mcp-chat --verbose
# Show help
mcp-chat --helpSupported Model/API Providers
OpenAI:
gpt-5.4-mini,gpt-5.2, etc.Anthropic:
claude-sonnet-4-6,claude-haiku-4-5, etc.Google (GenAI):
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview,gemini-2.5-flash, etc.xAI:
grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning,grok-3-mini, etc.Cerebras:
gpt-oss-120b, etc.Groq:
openai/gpt-oss-20b,openai/gpt-oss-120b, etc.
Configuration
Create a llm_mcp_config.json5 file:
The configuration file format for MCP servers follows the same structure as Claude for Desktop, with one difference: the key name
mcpServershas been changed tomcp_serversto follow the snake_case convention commonly used in JSON configuration files.The file format is JSON5, where comments and trailing commas are allowed.
The format is further extended to replace
${...}notations with the values of corresponding environment variables.Keep all the credentials and private info in the
.envfile and refer to them with${...}notation as needed
{
"llm": {
"provider": "openai", "model": "gpt-5.4-mini"
// "provider": "anthropic", "model": "claude-haiku-4-5"
// "provider": "google_genai", "model": "gemini-2.5-flash"
// "provider": "xai", "model": "grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning"
// "provider": "cerebras", "model": "gpt-oss-120b"
// "provider": "groq", "model": "openai/gpt-oss-20b"
},
"example_queries": [
"Read and briefly summarize the llm_mcp_config.json5 file in the current directory",
"Fetch the raw HTML content from bbc.com and tell me the titile",
// "Search for 'news in California' and show the first hit",
// "Tell me about my authenticated GitHub profile",
// "Tell me about my authenticated Notion account",
],
"mcp_servers": {
// Local MCP server that uses `npx`
// https://www.npmjs.com/package/@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem
"filesystem": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem",
"." // path to a directory to allow access to
]
},
// Local MCP server that uses `uvx`
// https://pypi.org/project/mcp-server-fetch/
"fetch": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"mcp-server-fetch"
]
},
// Embedding the value of an environment variable
// https://www.npmjs.com/package/@modelcontextprotocol/server-brave-search
"brave-search": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@modelcontextprotocol/server-brave-search"
],
"env": {
"BRAVE_API_KEY": "${BRAVE_API_KEY}"
}
},
// Example of remote MCP server authentication via Authorization header
// https://github.com/github/github-mcp-server?tab=readme-ov-file#remote-github-mcp-server
"github": {
// To avoid auto protocol fallback, specify the protocol explicitly when using authentication
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.githubcopilot.com/mcp/",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer ${GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN}"
}
},
// For remote MCP servers that require OAuth, consider using "mcp-remote"
"notion": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "mcp-remote", "https://mcp.notion.com/mcp"],
},
}
}Environment Variables
Create a .env file for API keys:
OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-ant-...
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-proj-...
GOOGLE_API_KEY=AI...
XAI_API_KEY=xai-...
CEREBRAS_API_KEY=csk-...
GROQ_API_KEY=gsk_...
# Other services as needed
GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN=github_pat_...
BRAVE_API_KEY=BSA...Popular MCP Servers to Try
There are quite a few useful MCP servers already available:
Troubleshooting
Make sure your configuration and .env files are correct, especially the spelling of the API keys
Check the local MCP server logs
Use
--verboseflag to view the detailed logs
Building from Source
See README_DEV.md for details.
Change Log
Can be found here
License
MIT License - see LICENSE file for details.
Contributing
Issues and pull requests welcome!
In particular, please share any issues relating to the latest versions of LLM models and specific MCP servers.
This tool aims to make MCP server testing as simple as possible.
Available Tools
2 toolsget-alertsC
Get weather alerts for a US state
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| state | Yes | Two-letter US state code (e.g. CA, NY) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description must carry full behavioral transparency. It only states the basic action without disclosing traits like read-only nature, authentication requirements, rate limits, or what type of alerts are returned. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, achieving conciseness. It is appropriately front-loaded with the verb and resource. However, it lacks structure such as prerequisites or return format, but it remains efficient for its length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description should provide more context, such as what the alerts contain or that it is a read operation. The minimal description leaves gaps for an agent to understand the tool's full context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage for the 'state' parameter, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema; it simply restates the parameter's role without further context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get') and resource ('weather alerts') with a specific scope ('for a US state'). It distinguishes itself from the sibling 'get-forecast' by focusing on alerts, not forecasts, though it does not explicitly mention the sibling.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get-forecast'. The description does not include any prerequisites, context, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage from tool names alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get-forecastB
Get weather forecast for a location in the US
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| latitude | Yes | Latitude of the location | |
| longitude | Yes | Longitude of the location |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as data source, update frequency, or limitations of the forecast. The description only states the basic purpose.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that immediately communicates the tool's purpose. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal but covers the core purpose. However, it lacks usage guidance and behavioral details that would help an AI agent use it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters described. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema; the mention of 'in the US' is a location constraint but not parameter-specific. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Get', the resource 'weather forecast', and the scope 'for a location in the US'. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'get-alerts' which likely deals with alerts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not indicate when to prefer this over 'get-alerts' or any other context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
The tools get-alerts and get-forecast have clearly distinct purposes: one provides weather alerts, the other gives forecasts. No overlap.
Both tool names follow the consistent pattern 'get-<resource>', using lowercase and hyphens, which is predictable.
With only 2 tools, the server feels too sparse for a weather domain. Typically, more operations like current conditions or radar would be expected.
The tool set only covers alerts and forecasts, missing common weather operations like current conditions, location search, or severe weather warnings, resulting in significant gaps.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
AI routing, memory, guardrails, and governance. Routes across Claude, GPT, Gemini.
Hosted MCP server for LLM cost estimation, model comparison, and budget-aware routing.
MCP server unifying ERPs, CRMs, APIs and knowledge base for Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini.
Furgonetka MCP Server is an extension for LLMs (such as Claude) that integrates AI assistants with Poland's most popular courier brokerage platform. The server enables models to interact directly with services from various couriers (including InPost, DPD, DHL, UPS, and Poczta Polska) through a single, unified interface. With this integration, your AI stops just "writing about logistics" and starts actually managing it.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceThis server provides an API to query Large Language Models using context from local files, supporting various models and file types for context-aware responses.1
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that provides a unified interface to various LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Groq, DeepSeek, and Ollama.6739
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA simple server that acts as a Master Control Program (MCP) for unified interaction with OpenAI and Anthropic (Claude) AI models through a single API endpoint.34MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA unified API server that enables interaction with multiple AI model providers like Anthropic and OpenAI through a consistent interface, supporting chat completions, tool calling, and context handling.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hideya/mcp-client-langchain-py'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server