Skip to main content
Glama
hidenorigoto

Sakura Cloud MCP Server

by hidenorigoto

Related Servers

Alternatives to Sakura Cloud MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Sakura Cloud that enables interaction with cloud resources and object storage. It allows users to manage Sakura Cloud infrastructure through natural language interfaces using the Model Context Protocol.
      41
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A plugin-based MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with external systems through custom tools, resources, and prompts.
      4
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct by resource type (e.g., disk, server, router) and action (get, create, delete), with minimal overlap. However, some tools like get_bill_detail and get_bill_info could be confused due to similar naming and purpose, and the AppRun tools (create, delete, update, start, stop) are well-separated but form a tight cluster that might require careful selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, using snake_case uniformly. All tools start with verbs like 'get', 'create', 'delete', 'start', 'stop', or 'update', followed by a specific resource name, making them predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 46 tools, the count is excessive for a cloud management server, likely overwhelming for agents and indicating poor scoping. While Sakura Cloud has many resource types, the server could benefit from consolidation or categorization to reduce cognitive load and improve usability.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for Sakura Cloud's domain, including CRUD operations for key resources like AppRun and extensive 'get' functions for various cloud components (servers, disks, networks, billing, etc.). Minor gaps exist, such as missing update/delete operations for many resources beyond AppRun, but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues