Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-pubmed-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides 16 intelligent tools for searching, retrieving, and linking biomedical literature from PubMed and PMC. It enables LLM applications to perform complex queries, batch processing, and cross-database linking.
      16
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides direct access to PubMed and PubMed Central via the NCBI E-utilities API. It enables AI models to search biomedical literature, retrieve detailed article metadata, and download open-access full texts.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for NCBI PubMed E-utilities with rate limiting, enabling article search, metadata retrieval, full-text access, BibTeX generation, and bibliography management.
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server implementation that enables searching and retrieving research articles from PubMed with specific focus on open access content filtering and full-text link retrieval.
      8 npm
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server for clinical biomedical literature retrieval, enabling PubMed search, article metadata, full-text access, and evidence summarization through MCP-compatible clients.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for searching and downloading academic papers from arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, and more. It integrates with LLMs like Claude Desktop for paper discovery.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have clear boundaries (e.g., get_details vs batch_query), but pubmed_quick_search and pubmed_search both perform searches with different output formats, which could cause misselection. The descriptions help differentiate them, so the ambiguity is moderate.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the pubmed_ prefix, which is a strong convention, but the internal structure mixes verb-led (search, get_details, extract_key_info) and noun-led (cache_info, fulltext_status, endnote_status) styles. This inconsistency makes the naming less predictable than a uniform verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 13 tools, the server is within the ideal 3-15 range and covers search, details, batch, and download workflows. However, four status/check tools (cache_info, fulltext_status, endnote_status, system_check) feel slightly redundant, making the count a bit heavier than necessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main PubMed workflows: searching, fetching details, batch queries, full-text detection and download. The main gap is an EndNote export tool—only the status is exposed—and there is no tool for citation export or advanced query building, but these are minor for the core purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues