Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to AirMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI to fully control macOS — mouse, keyboard, terminal, screenshots, window management, UI element detection, and provides AI-optimized information reporting.
      36
      17 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local macOS MCP servers for Mail, Calendar, Reminders, Notes, Contacts, Messages, Shortcuts, Files, Maps, and system tools. The unified Apple Tools server and individual app servers run over stdio with native macOS permissions; this is an MIT-licensed community project, unaffiliated with Apple.
      184
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP servers to interact with Apple's Mail, Notes, Reminders, and Calendar apps on macOS, enabling search, read, and write operations with configurable permissions and a single Full Disk Access grant.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for privacy-gated local Apple data access including Mail, Messages, Notes, Calendar, Contacts, Photos, Reminders, Voice Memos, and iCloud Drive.
      30
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A collection of MCP servers for Apple macOS apps (Mail, Contacts, Notes, Memory, Messages, Calendar, Reminders) enabling AI assistants to read, search, create, and update data via JXA, SQLite, and EventKit.
      760 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enterprise-grade macOS MCP server that gives AI agents eyes, hands, and a terminal, enabling screen capture, mouse/keyboard control, shell commands, and file operations.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear, distinct purposes—clipboard, shortcuts, notes, calendar, weather, and runtime management are each well-separated. However, suggest_next_tools and proactive_context both recommend tools based on usage patterns and could confuse an agent, and run_shortcut vs. run_tool may require careful reading.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_notes, set_clipboard, read_note). But a few deviants like today_events, profile_status, workflow_readiness, tool_session_status, and proactive_context break the pattern, making the set feel slightly inconsistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 28 tools, the server clearly exceeds the 25-tool threshold for well-scoped sets. Many runtime management tools (sessions, profiles, module packs, discovery, recommendations) could be consolidated, and the broad personal-assistant coverage inflates the count without adding coherent depth.

    Completeness2/5

    Domain coverage is severely shallow: notes support only list/search/read, reminders only list, calendar only list/today, and filesystem only list directory—no create, update, delete, or detailed operations. The runtime management side is more complete, but the personal-productivity surface has obvious gaps that will cause agent failures for basic workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week