calculator
Compute the result of arithmetic operations by providing two numbers.
Instructions
Calculates given numbers
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| firstNumber | Yes | Input field: firstNumber | |
| secondNumber | Yes | Input field: secondNumber |
Compute the result of arithmetic operations by providing two numbers.
Calculates given numbers
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| firstNumber | Yes | Input field: firstNumber | |
| secondNumber | Yes | Input field: secondNumber |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist. The description does not disclose behavior such as input validation, output format, or error handling. A simple calculator still requires stating the operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is short (12 words) but sacrifices clarity. It is not front-loaded with key details like operation type.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity and no output schema, the description is too vague for an agent to use correctly. It fails to specify what calculation is performed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema descriptions are non-informative ('Input field: firstNumber'). The tool description adds no further meaning beyond stating parameters exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Calculates given numbers' is vague and does not specify the operation (e.g., addition, subtraction). It barely avoids being a tautology by adding 'numbers' context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus the sibling website_loader. No context on prerequisites or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/heymrun/heym'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server