Skip to main content
Glama
heyhumayun

financial-research-mcp

by heyhumayun
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to financial-research-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • otto

      0Smallcat0
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate a local financial terminal, including market data, backtesting, paper portfolio management, and news digest, through safe, gated tools over MCP.
      6
      MIT

    • Aegis Risk

      isal-amir
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A multi-agent financial portfolio risk analyzer that provides MCP tools for fetching market news and storing compliance-reviewed assessment reports in a local database.
      -

    • desk

      Saivikaskillamsetty
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides multi-agent equity research for US markets with provenance-backed financial data from SEC EDGAR, technicals, macro, and Alpaca paper trading, enforcing risk limits and journaling theses.
      27
      -

    • ashare

      mengxiaoxian
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with standard MCP tool calls to run A-share market research workflows—macro analysis, daily review generation, strategy backtesting, watchlist scanning, stock analysis, and risk monitoring—while preserving manual confirmation for trade decisions.
      MIT

    • finagent-mesh-mcp

      caldeirav
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables financial agent workflows to perform agentic retrieval over SEC filings, rank filing types and passages, and synthesize answers from evidence using MCP tools, with MLflow tracing and FinAgentBench evaluation.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools map cleanly to distinct resources or calculations, but the three search_documents variants overlap considerably and an agent may struggle to choose between plain, vector, and semantic search. Descriptions help somewhat, but the boundaries remain unclear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_*, search_*, and calculate_*. This makes tool selection predictable and reinforces the purpose of each tool.

    Tool Count4/5

    Ten tools is a reasonable size for a financial research server covering data retrieval, document search, and analytics. The three document search variants add mild redundancy but do not make the count excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core research workflows: retrieving market data and fundamentals, searching news/papers/local documents, and computing common return and risk statistics. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit save/annotate workflow or more advanced analytics, but these are not critical for the apparent scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources