MCP Server Sorter
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| SORTER_DATA_DIR | No | Directory where data is stored. Defaults to .data beneath the directory where the service starts. |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_serversB | Search local catalog records and return evidence-linked deterministic rankings. |
| compare_serversC | Compare two to four distinct local server records in a pinned catalog. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
search_servers and compare_servers have distinct roles: one finds and ranks matching catalog records, the other directly compares a small fixed set of records. There is no real overlap because compare explicitly requires two to four pinned records rather than returning ranked search results.
Both tools follow the same verb_noun pattern with plural object nouns: search_servers and compare_servers. This is perfectly consistent and predictable.
With only two tools the server feels minimal for a catalog sorter, though the narrow scope of search-and-compare keeps it from being unreasonable. It is borderline rather than clearly well-scoped.
The core workflows of discovering ranked servers and comparing selected candidates are covered. A direct way to list the full catalog or fetch a single record would be a minor gap, but search can likely cover discovery.