Delete Hermes API response

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states it 'deletes' a stored response (consistent with the DELETE verb), includes the note about 'writing redacted receipts' (useful side-effect context), and references the configured server. However, annotations mark destructiveHint=false despite 'delete' semantics, and the description doesn't clarify whether this is a true destructive delete or something safer. It doesn't address auth requirements or failure behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single compact sentence that captures the HTTP method, resource path template, purpose, and a noteworthy side effect (redacted receipts). Efficient and front-loaded with the verb/DELETE and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a straightforward single-parameter DELETE wrapper with 100% schema coverage and an output schema present, so the description does not need to be extensive. It covers the core action and the notable redacted-receipt behavior, which is adequate for the low complexity level.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the single response_id parameter fully documented in the schema ('Stored response id to delete'). The description adds no new parameter info beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb (DELETE), the resource path (/v1/responses/{id}), and the action (delete a stored response). It clearly distinguishes from siblings like hermes_api_responses_get and hermes_api_responses_create by identifying the destructive counterpart operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly signals this is a delete operation on a specific response, but it does not state when to prefer it over alternatives, mention that get/create would be used for other purposes, or note any prerequisites (e.g., the response must exist). No explicit when/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.