Skip to main content
Glama
henu-wang

GEOScore MCP Server

geo_compare

Compare two domains' GEO readiness scores side by side to evaluate their AI search optimization and identify competitive advantages.

Instructions

Compare two domains' GEO readiness scores side by side. Returns both domain profiles with scores, grades, and metadata for direct comparison. Useful for competitive analysis.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domain1YesFirst domain (e.g. 'example.com')
domain2YesSecond domain (e.g. 'competitor.com')
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses return values (scores, grades, metadata) but omits behavioral traits like read-only nature, rate limits, or data freshness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences that front-load purpose, then add output detail and usage hint. Every sentence is valuable with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, description explains return type (scores, grades, metadata). Parameters are clear. Missing error handling or prerequisites, but sufficient for simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description does not add meaning beyond schema descriptions for the two domain parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool compares two domains' GEO readiness scores side by side, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like geo_get_profile (single domain) and geo_scan.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'useful for competitive analysis' providing some context, but lacks explicit when-to-use vs alternatives or when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/henu-wang/geoscore-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server