modify_algo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'modify an active algo' implying mutation, but no details on permissions, side effects, reversibility, or what happens during each action. Lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource, quickly enumerates actions. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's three parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description adequately covers the gist but omits important context like what happens if algo is not active, specific behavior of each action (e.g., immediate effect), and any prerequisites.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is low (33%), but the description adds meaning by explaining the action enum values and that update_pov_rate involves a new rate. However, algo_id gets no additional context, and new_pov_rate's need for action=update_pov_rate is already in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool modifies an active algo and enumerates the specific actions (pause, resume, update POV participation rate). This distinguishes it from siblings like cancel_algo and check_algo_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for pausing, resuming, or updating POV rate, but does not explicitly state when to use or not use alternatives (e.g., cancel_algo). No guidance on prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.