Skip to main content
Glama
henrikogaard

jottacloud-mcp

by henrikogaard
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to jottacloud-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Aura

      XRSec
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely access local machine capabilities such as file operations, shell commands, Skills, and Pi Tools through a controlled MCP interface with token authorization and multiple tunnel options.
      134 npm
      1
      MIT

    • filezop

      Jefreesujit
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes file system operations to AI clients via MCP, enabling secure read, write, and management of files and folders.
      4 npm
      MIT

    • gdrive-mcp-server

      devinxiong97
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI assistants to interact with a user's Google Drive, including listing, searching, reading, creating, updating, and deleting files, with authentication via Google OAuth.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: authentication, listing roots, listing directory contents, metadata retrieval, searching, reading file content, and trash listing. No overlap or ambiguity between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (list_roots, get_file_info, search_files, etc.). Naming is predictable and uniform across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a cloud storage MCP. Each tool serves a distinct function without redundancy or missing essentials, fitting comfortably in the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-focused surface covers listing, searching, metadata, and file reading, plus trash handling. Write operations (upload, delete, move) are absent, but if the server is intended for read-only access, only minor gaps remain (e.g., no way to download complete files without streaming limits).

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources