remove_stream_profile
Remove an existing stream profile from the Axis camera configuration to clean up unused profiles.
Instructions
Remove a stream profile.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Profile name to remove |
Remove an existing stream profile from the Axis camera configuration to clean up unused profiles.
Remove a stream profile.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Profile name to remove |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint: true, so the destructive nature is known. The description adds no further behavioral context (e.g., reversibility, authorization requirements, or side effects).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, avoiding verbosity. However, it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema) and annotations that cover destructiveness, the minimal description is adequate but lacks explicit confirmation of prerequisites like profile existence.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with the 'name' parameter well-documented. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, but follows the baseline for full coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Remove a stream profile' clearly states the action (remove) and the resource (stream profile), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create, update, or get stream profiles.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites, conditions, or when not to remove a profile.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hemla-com/axis-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server