Skip to main content
Glama
hellob1889

Pandaone Guard

by hellob1889
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Pandaone Guard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • sofagent

      KongFangXun
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Commit-time audit engine for AI coding agents. Scans git diffs with 24 audit rules, writes HMAC-signed tamper-evident audit history, and ships MCP tools for governance aggregation.
      104
      52
      MIT

    • gitmem

      josephy02
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools that give AI agents persistent, append-only memory in a git repository, letting them record observations, decisions, and corrections while retrieving context briefs, current facts, conflicts, and traceable event history without a vector database.
      3 npm
      MIT

    • AEGIS Governance

      undercurrentai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Quantitative governance gate for AI agents. Six gates (risk, profit, novelty, complexity, quality, utility) return PROCEED/PAUSE/HALT/ESCALATE with confidence scores and hash-chained, tamper-evident audit trails. Generates NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act Annex IV artifacts. 10 MCP tools; local stdio and hosted Streamable HTTP with a free tier.
      MIT

    • SpecLock

      sgroy10
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI Constraint Engine that enforces CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, and AGENTS.md rules as laws. 51 MCP tools for semantic conflict detection, patch review, drift scoring, pre-commit hooks, and Guardian Mode. Catches euphemisms, temporal evasion, and hidden violations that keyword matching misses.
      240 npm
      25
      MIT

    • Testers AI CARBON Test Harness

      jarbon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local, MIT-licensed AI test harness with 10 MCP tools and 11 prompts for risk-based testing, accessibility checks, quality maps, evidence, and interactive reports. Runs over stdio against an explicitly configured project folder; uses the host AI coding agent, with no hosted backend or runtime telemetry.
      1
      MIT

    • Vorim AI — Agent Identity &

      Vorim-AI-Labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI agent identity, permissions, trust scores, and tamper-evident audit trails. 17 MCP tools: register agents (Ed25519 keypairs), check permissions (sub-5ms), emit audit events, verify trust scores (0-100), delegate credentials, ephemeral agents. IETF Internet-Draft filed. Works with LangChain, OpenAI, CrewAI, Stripe ACP. npx @vorim/mcp-server
      17
      83 npm
      66
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a largely distinct purpose: initialization, audited writes, lock/unlock, logging/status, hook/watch setup, portable git install, fingerprint update, and CI verification. Minor boundary overlap exists between status and log viewing, and between hook/git installation tools, but descriptions clarify the intended use.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools consistently use the pandaone_ prefix with snake_case, making the set easy to scan. However, the pattern mixes verbs, nouns, and abbreviations rather than following a strict verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a file audit and protection system. Each tool appears to earn its place by covering a distinct operational area without excessive fragmentation.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: init, audited write/create, lock/unlock, logs, status, hooks, watchdog, git setup, fingerprint update, and CI verification. Minor gaps remain around explicit configuration/protected-extension management, manual verification outside CI, and cleanup/uninstall workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources