n8n-pro-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to n8n-pro-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to manage workflows, monitor executions, and perform administrative tasks in n8n through natural language conversations with Claude. It provides over 40 tools to control self-hosted or cloud n8n instances via the Model Context Protocol.4254 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceWraps the n8n self-hosted REST API to let Claude and MCP-compatible LLMs manage workflows, executions, credentials, and more via natural language.3954 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to fully automate n8n instances via 34 MCP tools, covering workflow creation, execution debugging, credential management, environment variables, tags, and user administration through natural language.341-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Large Language Models to interact with n8n automation instances through the Model Context Protocol. Supports workflow management, execution, credentials handling, and security audits through natural language commands.3350 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceFree & open-source MCP server for n8n. Manage your workflows, debug executions and control your self-hosted n8n instance directly from any Model Context Protocol client.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for managing n8n workflows, allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible tools to create, read, update, delete, and execute workflows in your n8n instance.54 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 51 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with detailed descriptions that prevent ambiguity. Even with 51 tools, operations are well-separated across different resources (workflows, credentials, users, projects, etc.) and actions.
All tool names use lowercase snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., activate_workflow, list_users). The naming is highly consistent with no mixing of conventions.
The 51 tools cover a broad domain (n8n instance management), and each tool appears justified. However, the count is high; a slightly more consolidated set could be conceivable, but the current scope earns a 4.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle of workflows, credentials, users, projects, tags, variables, and executions, including advanced operations like cloning, validation, bulk actions, and health monitoring. No obvious gaps are present.