Skip to main content
Glama
hectortemich

@deonpay/mcp-server

by hectortemich

Related Servers

Alternatives to @deonpay/mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage merchant accounts, process payments, handle wallets and payouts, and sell digital goods through the wata.pro payment system.
      90
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and LLMs to interact with the PAYONE Commerce Platform through MCP tools for managing commerce cases, checkouts, payments, orders, and payment information.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts like Claude, VS Code, Cursor, and others to discover payment methods, create payment links, verify payments, inspect invoices, and manage refunds through focused tools, with a guided safe payment workflow and a restricted generic API escape hatch.
      7
      20 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI tools to create checkouts, generate KHQR codes, check/list transactions, issue refunds, create payment links, and pull exchange rates via ABA Bank's PayWay API.
      12
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with PayBridgeNP payment gateway accounts through natural language. Provides read-only access to payments, refunds, analytics, and account data, with write capabilities planned for future versions.
      8 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (e.g., create, get, list, update) for specific entities like products, links, subscriptions, customers, and transactions. Even similar-sounding tools (e.g., get_subscription vs get_customer_subscription) are clearly differentiated by scope (plan vs individual subscriber).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent `deonpay_<verb>_<resource>` pattern in snake_case (e.g., deonpay_create_product, deonpay_list_transactions). There are no deviations, making the convention predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    20 tools cover the key operations for a payment processing domain (CRUD for products, links, subscriptions, customers, transactions, plus metrics and checkout). The count is well-scoped—neither excessive nor insufficient—for the apparent purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows (create/read/update/list for products and links, list/read for customers and transactions, subscription management). Minor gaps exist: lack of update_subscription (plans) and cancel customer subscription. Otherwise, the set is thorough.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues