Skip to main content
Glama
hechen-coder

Microsoft To Do MCP

by hechen-coder
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Microsoft To Do MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • To Do & Planner MCP Server

      srchauhan29
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to create, read, update and delete Microsoft To Do lists, tasks and checklist items, and Microsoft Planner plans, buckets and tasks, through Microsoft Graph as the signed-in user. Lists, plans and buckets can be referenced by ID or exact name, with destructive deletes requiring confirmation.
      MIT

    • Remote MCP Entra ID Todo

      anoopt
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive Microsoft To Do task management through Microsoft Graph API with Entra ID OAuth authentication. Supports creating, updating, and managing todo lists, tasks, reminders, and due dates through natural language.
      -

    • todo-mcp

      jc1122
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Microsoft To Do tasks via the Graph API, supporting multiple accounts, encrypted auth, and full CRUD operations.
      9 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources or actions, but the 'today' tools (get_today_tasks, get_my_day, add_today_task) and add_task vs add_today_task can be confused. Descriptions clarify the differences, so misselection is limited.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (list_tasks, add_step, update_task), which is predictable. Minor deviations like auth_status (noun_noun) and login (bare verb) are readable but not perfectly consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    18 tools is on the heavy side for a To Do client; several granular step tools and separate complete/uncomplete could be consolidated. The count is borderline but not excessive for the domain's sub-resources.

    Completeness3/5

    Task and step lifecycles are well covered, but list lifecycle is incomplete: create_list and list_lists exist with no update_list or delete_list. There is also no get_task for single-task detail retrieval, leaving notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources