Skip to main content
Glama
hecateq
by hecateq

Related Servers

Alternatives to Coolify MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that lets AI agents use gated APIs without holding keys, enforcing declarative policies, injecting secrets server-side, and auditing access without content.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server that gives AI agents safe access to your local dev environment: filesystem, databases, processes, and OpenAPI specs.
      15
      31 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for Coolify infrastructure management, providing 45 tools for servers, applications, databases, deployments, and diagnostics via natural language.
      97 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates with Coolify to let AI assistants manage Coolify instances via a clean toolkit wrapping the official REST API.
      35
      140 npm
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 59 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools follow a clear resource-action pattern with distinct entities (servers, projects, deployments, etc.). A few pairs like list_database_backups vs list_backup_executions and set_environment_variable(s) could be confused, but descriptions provide adequate differentiation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools consistently use the coolify_ prefix followed by verb_noun (list_servers, get_server, create_application). A few tools deviate with bare verbs (deploy, restart, start, stop) or noun-only names (health, project_overview), but the pattern is largely predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 59 tools, the server presents a very large surface area. While the domain is broad, the count exceeds reasonable expectations and places a heavy burden on agent selection, even if each tool may be individually useful.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers creation, reading, updating, and deployment for core resources, but lacks delete operations for applications, services, databases, and other entities. Additionally, services have no dedicated update tool, leaving notable gaps in lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues