proofmill
Related Servers
Alternatives to proofmill
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous data quality inspection and repair workflows. It scans DuckDB warehouses for anomalies, generates and verifies fixes in a dry-run copy, then applies them after validation, with full audit logging.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables a language model to run four deterministic data checks it cannot argue with — column-contract validation with an explicit quarantine list, arithmetic reconciliation of opening/movements/closing, distinct entity counting against row counts, and duplicate detection returned for human review — each answering with structured findings and row/column locators. Failures come back as results with reasons, so the model reports exactly which rows and columns are broken rather than asserting the data is clean.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to audit datasets against DAMA-DMBOK quality dimensions, sanitize PII, generate differential-privacy synthetic twins, compress prompt context, and export dbt schema tests and interactive HTML reports. It supports development against sensitive data with zero real records exposed to external LLMs.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to compare database tables using read-only tools, with credentials managed locally and never exposed to the model.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAgentic data quality MCP server — runs structured validation rules against warehouses (DuckDB, BigQuery, Athena, Databricks, Postgres), diagnoses failures with LLM root cause analysis, and proposes SQL remediations. Full audit trail of every AI decision.64Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query governed data warehouses through plain language, returning grounded answers with SQL, confidence grades, and signed receipts while enforcing access, testing, and audit controls.174 PyPI15Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct stage in the proofmill workflow: profiling, recipe schema creation, validation, comparison execution, and receipt explanation. There is no meaningful overlap between their responsibilities.
All tools share the proofmill_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, which is predictable. Four names are verb-led, while recipe_schema is noun-led, a minor deviation from the otherwise consistent pattern.
Five tools is well-scoped for a focused data profiling and comparison pipeline. Each tool earns its place and corresponds to a clear phase in the workflow.
The core lifecycle is covered: profile, schema, validate, execute, and explain. A minor gap is the lack of a tool for listing saved receipts or inspecting broader comparison outputs beyond tracing a single business key.