Skip to main content
Glama
heavnzor

proofmill

by heavnzor
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to proofmill

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • data-quality-loop

      auron-lmh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous data quality inspection and repair workflows. It scans DuckDB warehouses for anomalies, generates and verifies fixes in a dry-run copy, then applies them after validation, with full audit logging.
      MIT

    • datadiffer

      gauthierpiarrette
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to compare database tables using read-only tools, with credentials managed locally and never exposed to the model.
      MIT
    • aegis-dq by aegis-dq

      aegis-dqofficial

      aegis-dq
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Agentic data quality MCP server — runs structured validation rules against warehouses (DuckDB, BigQuery, Athena, Databricks, Postgres), diagnoses failures with LLM root cause analysis, and proposes SQL remediations. Full audit trail of every AI decision.
      6
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • dst by get-dst

      dstofficial

      get-dst
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query governed data warehouses through plain language, returning grounded answers with SQL, confidence grades, and signed receipts while enforcing access, testing, and audit controls.
      12
      Apache 2.0

    • MCP Analytics Server

      Jojeda96
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover and execute analytical queries on a DuckDB dataset through typed MCP tools, with guarded read-only SQL support for complex calculations without direct database access.
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage in the proofmill workflow: profiling, recipe schema creation, validation, comparison execution, and receipt explanation. There is no meaningful overlap between their responsibilities.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the proofmill_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, which is predictable. Four names are verb-led, while recipe_schema is noun-led, a minor deviation from the otherwise consistent pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a focused data profiling and comparison pipeline. Each tool earns its place and corresponds to a clear phase in the workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: profile, schema, validate, execute, and explain. A minor gap is the lack of a tool for listing saved receipts or inspecting broader comparison outputs beyond tracing a single business key.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources