Skip to main content
Glama

create_record

Add a new record to a specified Headlo collection using field values, with optional status of draft or published.

Instructions

Create a new record in a collection

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesField values keyed by field_id
statusNodraft
workspace_idNoWorkspace ID — omit to use the first workspace from context
collection_idYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It merely states 'Create a new record' without explaining mutation semantics, default behaviors (e.g., status default), or what the operation returns. It essentially restates the tool's name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (8 words), which is easy to parse and front-loaded. However, it is under-specified and omits critical context, so conciseness comes at the expense of usefulness. It is not a tautology, but it barely exceeds a minimal phrase.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has moderate complexity (4 params, nested objects) with no output schema and no annotations. The description explains neither return values nor operational details, leaving the agent with insufficient information to invoke correctly. It fails to compensate for the missing structured context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 50%, and the description adds no parameter-level information. The schema provides some meaning via descriptions for data and workspace_id, but collection_id is undocumented, and status has only an enum. The description does nothing to clarify parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'record in a collection', which distinguishes it from siblings like update_record or create_collection. However, it lacks detail about what creating a record entails (e.g., field values) and could be more specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention any context, exclusions, or relationships with sibling tools like create_collection or create_page.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/headlohq/headlo-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server