Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
okf-tools

okf-tools

by hdean-ssp
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

commit_concept

Add a new concept to a knowledge bundle by specifying title, type, and content, with optional duplicate checking.

Instructions

Commit a new concept to the knowledge bundle.

Creates a concept file with the given title, type, and content. Optionally checks for duplicate concepts before committing.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "title": "<title>",
      "type": "<type>",
      "content": "<content>"
    },
    "name": "commit_concept"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathNo
tagsNo
typeYes
titleYes
contentYes
check_duplicatesNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions duplicate checking but omits side effects, idempotency, authentication needs, or what happens on duplicate existence when check is false.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences front-loaded with purpose. No fluff, but could benefit from structured enumeration of parameters for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite output schema existence, description does not mention return values or error conditions. Lacks prerequisites, expected behavior for optional parameters, and implications of duplicate checking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%. Description explains only title, type, and content, and notes check_duplicates. Omits path and tags entirely, failing to add meaning beyond parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it commits a new concept to the knowledge bundle, specifying verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like delete_concept or update_concept by focusing on creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; lacks context on prerequisites (e.g., needing an initialized bundle) or scenarios where it should be avoided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools