No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 107 tools
The tool set is organized into several near-identical workflow families (prepare/plan/run/status/review for study_board, study_collection, study_revision, board_adoption, and batch) whose boundaries are hard to distinguish without deep reading. Many read/select/copy/restore tools also overlap (select_object vs select_match vs select_board_match; restore_page vs verify_restored_page; copy_page vs copy_text_object vs copy_native_selection), inviting misselection.
Almost all names use a snake_case goodnotes_ prefix with a verb_noun structure, and the workflow suffixes (prepare/plan/run/status/review) are applied consistently. Minor deviations like board_settings, operation_status, object_colors, image_crop_info and batch_help use noun phrases rather than verbs, but the overall convention is predictable.
107 tools is far beyond a reasonable agent-facing surface for a single server, even for a feature-rich app like Goodnotes. The workflow families multiply into dozens of near-duplicate entry points, and an agent must carry an enormous schema just to choose a tool.
Coverage is broad: library browsing, document/page management, templates, trash/restore, boards, text/object editing, OCR, handwriting, exports, snapshots, outlines, folders, and batch/study workflows. Gaps are minor — no sharing/collaboration, no permanent deletion, no custom palette writes, and nested outline editing is explicitly unsupported.