Skip to main content
Glama
hawklithm

sensitive-info-mcp

by hawklithm

Related Servers

Alternatives to sensitive-info-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to detect and anonymize over 25 types of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) using Microsoft Presidio. It supports various redaction strategies and can process both plain text and structured data to help ensure data privacy.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing on-prem PII detection and anonymization tools (scan and is_sensitive) for AI agents, ensuring data stays local.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for automatic detection and redaction of PII in text, with anonymization and deanonymization capabilities, all local processing.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing data masking tools for credit card numbers and email addresses, enabling privacy protection through natural language commands.
      2
      4 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP proxy that pseudo-anonymizes PII before data reaches external AI providers like Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini.
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for locally masking personal data in documents before sending them to a language model, then restoring the original data in the model's response.
      6
      17
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing rules, masking files/text, scanning files/text, and generating reports. The only potential overlap (scan_text vs. scan_report) is resolved by different return formats (JSON vs. Markdown).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., list_rules, mask_file, scan_text). No mixing of conventions or irregular names.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is an appropriate number for a sensitive info scanning and masking server. Each tool covers a necessary operation without redundancy or excessive specialization.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core workflows: scanning (file and text), masking (file and text), report generation, and rule listing. A minor gap is the lack of rule management tools (add/modify rules), but the primary detection and masking functionality is complete.