sensitive-info-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sensitive-info-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to detect and anonymize over 25 types of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) using Microsoft Presidio. It supports various redaction strategies and can process both plain text and structured data to help ensure data privacy.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing on-prem PII detection and anonymization tools (scan and is_sensitive) for AI agents, ensuring data stays local.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for automatic detection and redaction of PII in text, with anonymization and deanonymization capabilities, all local processing.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents and applications to scan text streams for personally identifiable information, financial account numbers, JWT tokens, and cryptographic keys, returning sanitized output with deterministic zero-leakage masking. It runs as a zero-dependency MCP stdio server or importable Python module so regulatory compliance policies (GDPR/HIPAA-style) can be enforced on data before it leaves a workflow.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing data masking tools for credit card numbers and email addresses, enabling privacy protection through natural language commands.212 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP proxy that pseudo-anonymizes PII before data reaches external AI providers like Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini.18MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing rules, masking files/text, scanning files/text, and generating reports. The only potential overlap (scan_text vs. scan_report) is resolved by different return formats (JSON vs. Markdown).
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., list_rules, mask_file, scan_text). No mixing of conventions or irregular names.
Six tools is an appropriate number for a sensitive info scanning and masking server. Each tool covers a necessary operation without redundancy or excessive specialization.
The tool set covers core workflows: scanning (file and text), masking (file and text), report generation, and rule listing. A minor gap is the lack of rule management tools (add/modify rules), but the primary detection and masking functionality is complete.