eu-law-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to eu-law-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching and quoting EU legislation with verifiable EUR-Lex citations, including GDPR, NIS2, DORA, and the EU AI Act.10 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides structured access to EU treaties, regulations, directives, and CJEU case law via 14 tools for searching, retrieving, and analyzing legislation and court decisions.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAcquis gives your assistant exact, verifiable access to EU digital regulation. Instead of paraphrasing from training data, it returns the verbatim provision of the current consolidated version — with the full citation (act, article, paragraph, point), its in-force status, the consolidation date, and a deep link to EUR-Lex so every claim can be checked. The legal text is rendered from the signed cMIT

kvasir-legalofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceVerifiable German, Austrian, Swiss and EU law: resolve citations to the wording in force, verify the citations a model produced against the official source, and walk the citation graph.-- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving EU legal documents (regulations, directives, court decisions) via the EUR-Lex Cellar API, supporting full-text search, metadata, citations, and consolidated versions without requiring an API key.11500 npm6MIT

Moonlit Legal Researchofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOfficial European law, expanding globally: 20M+ documents, 35+ jurisdictions, verifiable citations.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Every tool targets a distinct retrieval or search operation with clear domain boundaries: legislation vs. case law vs. EDPB vs. EDPS. Even similar operations like get_article and get_provision_at_date are differentiated by identifier vs. date, and version-related tools (timeline, list, compare) have non-overlapping purposes.
All 16 tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_, search_, compare_, find_, list_, verify_). The verbs are descriptive and uniform, making the tool surface predictable and easy to navigate for an agent.
With 16 tools, the server is slightly above the optimal 3–15 range but still well-scoped for its multi-domain purpose (legislation, case law, EDPB, EDPS). Each tool earns its place, covering distinct operations without unnecessary bloat.
The set provides comprehensive coverage for a read-only legal information server: full-document retrieval, granular provision access (articles, recitals, paragraphs), version history and comparison, date-based access, and citation verification. No obvious dead ends or missing core operations are apparent.