Skip to main content
Glama
financial-modeling-harness

financial-modeling-harness

Related Servers

Alternatives to financial-modeling-harness

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate real financing decisions through deterministic tools for IRR, NPV, payback, working capital, break-even, and sensitivity analysis.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides startup verification tools including domain/package/org availability checks, unit economics, runway, market size, and cap table calculations with transparent formulas and warnings to prevent common agent errors.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform variance analysis, generate reconciling driver bridges and three-statement forecasts, export Excel workbooks, and analyze SEC or private-company financial data locally with engine-verified calculations.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with deterministic, offline finance tools for commodity margin analysis, loan covenant compliance, invoice auditing, AP exception classification, and five-day close readiness.
      14
      3 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local deterministic scoring for startup audits with twenty pure-function tools, allowing GO/KILL verdicts, composite scores, market, money, and signal calculations without accounts, network, or model calls.
      20
      38 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to synthesize multi-tab enterprise spreadsheet financial models, detect circular references, compile formula dependency DAGs with functions like SUMIFS/XLOOKUP/CAGR/NPV, and evaluate deterministic preview cell matrices.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct stage of the modeling lifecycle (readiness, validation, run, verification, sensitivity sweep, summary read). The only mild overlaps are doctor vs. validate (both 'checks') and run vs. sensitivity (sensitivity recalculates the model), but the descriptions clearly separate environment readiness from input validation and single-run from driver sweeps.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a `finance_` namespace prefix and use short, readable verb-style suffixes (doctor, validate, run, verify, sensitivity). The only deviation is `finance_get_summary`, which switches to a verb_noun form while others use a bare verb or noun.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the sweet spot and each one corresponds to a meaningful, non-redundant step in the workflow. There are no filler or trivially thin tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: readiness check, input validation, model execution, artifact verification, sensitivity analysis, and summary retrieval. Minor gaps exist around managing saved runs (listing or deleting prior immutable runs) and exporting results, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues