Skip to main content
Glama
harshitagarwal2

tradingrearchagents

Related Servers

Alternatives to tradingrearchagents

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes TradingAgents multi-agent financial research as async tasks, generating research reports and non-executive decisions for LLM hosts without touching trading accounts.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides a stateful, resettable, verifiable API runtime that gates every tool call, enabling agents to run long workflows against provider-shaped environments without live provider write access. It records decisions, side effects, and outcome evidence for replayable, verifiable benchmark runs.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing tools for read-only SQL queries, REST API calls, sandboxed Python execution, and resource lifecycle management, enabling multi-step research and data tasks.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server exposing a registry of paper-backed quantitative trading methods plus a deterministic, no-LLM decision helper for reproducible trading research.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Pyon trading platform that lets AI agents search markets, generate research, build and edit node-graph strategies, run backtests, diagnose problems, and optimize parameters with 2-D sweeps.
      13
      10 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have overlapping boundaries: get_run, get_run_events, get_run_result, get_run_view, get_run_control all retrieve run data but differ subtly in scope and purpose. Similarly, run_fixture, create_host_run, and start_host_run all initiate executions, and import_host_run vs finalize_host_run both validate and publish dossiers. The differences are hard to discern from names alone.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, create_, start_, run_, pause_, resume_, finalize_), with a few camelCase outliers like launch_local_dashboard, prepare_host_run, and append_run_receipts that break the underscore convention. The dominant pattern is readable and predictable, but the mixed style is a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    27 tools is on the heavy side, especially for what appears to be a single-purpose trading research harness. Many tools (get_run, get_run_events, get_run_result, get_run_view, get_run_control, poll_run_events) overlap substantially in the retrieval space, suggesting the surface could be consolidated significantly.

    Completeness4/5

    The host-run lifecycle is comprehensively covered: create, start, commit, pause, resume, cancel, finalize, export, and query. Decision memory has both recall and record-outcome operations. Minor gaps exist around fixture editing or host-run deletion, but the core research workflow appears fully covered with no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues