agent-trace-intelligence
Related Servers
Alternatives to agent-trace-intelligence
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables analysis of AI agent traces to detect and fix failures using heuristic detectors, with no LLM calls required.225 PyPI1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables recording and analyzing AI agent execution traces, including event logging, metric computation, loop detection, and JSON export for debugging agent behavior.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceSupercharges AI-assisted debugging of Playwright tests by parsing trace files to extract failures, action history, network logs, screenshots, and suggesting fixes.66 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceScores AI agent trajectories and detects silent failures, loops, and reliability issues with zero external API cost.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides tools to analyze and debug GitHub Actions CI failures, including summarizing failures, detecting flaky tests, and suggesting fixes.105 npm1ISC
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that unpacks and structures Playwright trace.zip archives so AI agents can perform root-cause analysis on CI failures, with 16 focused tools for inspection, DOM/UI analysis, root-cause analysis, and performance analysis.1933 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools are largely distinct: judge_trace provides an overall verdict, trace_breakdown offers step-by-step scoring, and efficiency_score focuses on efficiency metrics. However, judge_trace and trace_breakdown both provide performance scores, which could cause some confusion about which to use for a given task.
The naming pattern is inconsistent: judge_trace follows a verb_noun convention while trace_breakdown and efficiency_score use noun_noun. Although all names use snake_case, the lack of a consistent pattern makes it harder to predict tool names.
With only three tools, the server is well-scoped for its niche purpose of agent trace analysis. Each tool addresses a distinct aspect (overall judgment, detailed breakdown, and efficiency), so none feels redundant.
The server covers the core analysis lifecycle: holistic diagnosis, step-by-step scoring, and efficiency measurement. Minor gaps exist, such as the lack of tools for comparing multiple traces or retrieving raw trace data, but these are not critical to the primary function.