Skip to main content
Glama
harelrech

c2pa-mcp

by harelrech

Related Servers

Alternatives to c2pa-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables reading and verifying C2PA Content Credentials from images and videos through both embedded manifests and invisible watermarks. Supports direct filesystem access, URL checking, and provides structured provenance data including creator identity, AI generation info, and content authenticity.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an agent to determine whether an image is AI-generated, edited, or captured by reading signed C2PA Content Credentials first and falling back to labelled pixel-level forensic heuristics (noise, ELA, spectral, colour, EXIF) only when no manifest exists. Runs fully offline with no API keys or cloud calls, and can report tampering when pixels no longer match a signed hash.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables verification of download, installer, repository, or model URLs to determine whether the source is official, returning verdicts with confidence scores, reasons, and verifiable evidence.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze images from a URL, local path, or Base64 string and determine whether they are AI-generated, including detection of signatures from Flux, Midjourney, DALL·E, and Stable Diffusion. Also inspects cryptographic C2PA provenance manifests, signing certificate authorities, and camera EXIF metadata without requiring API keys or accounts.
      2
      270 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides MCP-compatible AI agents with a verify_image tool to check a photo's capture time and provenance using C2PA, EXIF, XMP metadata, and pixel forensics, returning a verdict and confidence score.
      1
      51 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: local file verification, remote URL verification, directory scanning, and server info. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools use a consistent verb_c2pa_noun pattern, but c2pa_info deviates by omitting a verb. Still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is on the lower end but appropriate for a focused verification server. Each tool serves a clear role without redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    Covers all primary verification workflows: local file, remote URL, batch scanning, and capabilities. No obvious gaps for a verification-only tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessWithin a week