file.write
Write content to a file at a specified path, enabling file creation or overwrite.
Instructions
Write a file.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | No | ||
| content | No |
Write content to a file at a specified path, enabling file creation or overwrite.
Write a file.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | No | ||
| content | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, directory creation, overwrite behavior, or permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but at the cost of critical missing information. While front-loaded, the content is insufficient to be useful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool performs a write operation with 2 parameters and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. Missing details on behavior, return value, and error cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 2 parameters with 0% description coverage. Description adds no information about path format, content encoding, or constraints beyond the basic schema types.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states verb 'Write' and resource 'file', but lacks detail on whether it creates, overwrites, or appends. It distinguishes from siblings only minimally.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like file.copy or file.move. No context about prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/haoyun18881-beep/universal-brute-workpack'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server