Skip to main content
Glama
haolamnm

tinyroe

by haolamnm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to tinyroe

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • tinyfish-search-fetch-mcp

      dummie21
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server enabling web search and content fetching via TinyFish Free Access API with support for single and burst URL fetch.
      3
      MIT

    • scrapesearch-mcp

      tonmoy-dhroubo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides web search scraping from DuckDuckGo (with Mojeek fallback) and URL content fetching as markdown/text or raw HTML.
      1
      ISC

    • free-search-mcp-ts

      lhswgzy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP client to run keyless multi-engine web searches with RRF fusion, fetch pages and documents as Markdown, and full-text search a local SQLite index. It keeps queries and cached content on the user's machine, degrading gracefully across engine tiers when providers are blocked or rate-limited.
      8
      MIT

    • scrapyard

      artboarding-hash
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for web search and page extraction, providing clean markdown from URLs, search results, site mapping, and research endpoints without API keys or accounts.
      5
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Search discovers relevant URLs while fetch_content retrieves page content, making their roles complementary rather than overlapping. The description explicitly advises using search before fetch_content when the target page is unknown, further reducing ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tool names are clear action-oriented verbs, though one is a bare verb (search) and the other follows a verb_noun pattern (fetch_content). This is a minor stylistic inconsistency rather than a functional or comprehension problem.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is borderline for a web research server, but the pair covers the essential search-then-fetch workflow compactly. The limited surface feels thin rather than bloated, and each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The two tools form a complete core workflow: discover URLs via search and retrieve full content via fetch_content. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking search filters or page-level extraction options, but agents can accomplish the main research task without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources