acs_reboot_device

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It simply says 'reboot device' without mentioning potential side effects such as device downtime, required permissions, or irreversibility. This is a significant gap for a mutating operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, containing just the essential verb and object with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient, though it might be too minimal for a tool with potential side effects. Still, from a conciseness standpoint, it earns a high score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a reboot operation, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the impact on the device (e.g., temporary unavailability), any required authentication, or the expected outcome. Given there is no output schema, the description should provide more context to help the agent understand the tool's full behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides complete description for the only parameter 'sn' (设备序列号), and the description does not add any additional semantics. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline of 3 is appropriate; the description adds no extra value but also does not create confusion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '重启设备' clearly states the action (reboot) and resource (device), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'acs_restart', which might also involve restarting something, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'acs_restart'. There is no mention of prerequisite conditions, exclusions, or typical scenarios. This leaves the agent uncertain about selecting the correct tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.