emaki
Related Servers
Alternatives to emaki
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables video generation from text, images, and more through MCP-compatible apps like Claude and Cursor.55MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients such as Claude Desktop and Cursor to generate images and videos, synthesize speech, clone voices, and design custom voices from descriptive prompts. It supports stdio, REST, and SSE transport modes with configurable API hosts, keys, and local or URL-based resource output.549 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables any MCP-compatible AI agent to generate videos and images from text or reference frames, chain scenes into seamless multi-scene films with sound and speech, and download finished media with manifests and previews. It also exposes account status, plan limits, history and library management through confirm-gated, safe-by-default operations.2434MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceGenerate AI images and videos from Claude, Cursor or any MCP client: 48+ models on one account (Flux 2, Nano Banana 2, Seedream 5, Kling V3, Seedance 2.5, Veo 3.1), with the exact cost in credits returned on every call.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables video and image generation from any MCP client, with support for models like Veo 3.1, Grok Imagine, and Nano Banana, including text-to-video, image-to-video, image generation and editing.465 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude, Cursor, or any MCP client to create consistent AI characters, generate Veo 3.1 and Omni videos, edit clips, build scenes, export MP4s, and chat with Google Flow's creative agent. Automates AI video production workflows such as reels, storyboards, and multi-shot stories through natural language, with credit guardrails and dry-run pricing.2310MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: credits reads balance, generate_video/generate_image produce different media types, and check_status polls async runs. No two tools can be reasonably confused for one another.
Three of four tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (generate_video, generate_image, check_status). The outlier is 'credits', a bare noun that breaks the pattern but remains unambiguous.
Four tools is a tight, well-scoped surface for a generation service. Each earns its place: two generators, one async poller required by the async design, and one account query.
The generate-then-poll lifecycle is covered end to end, plus credit awareness. Minor gaps exist (no list/history of past runs, no cancel or delete for an in-flight run), but the core workflow has no dead ends.