kaoyan-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to kaoyan-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to act as a state-driven tutoring engine over MCP, with server-side mastery estimation, prerequisite checks, evidence-based assessment, and FSRS spaced review scheduling.581MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI clients to create spaced-repetition flashcards from material being learned, quiz users aloud, grade answers, and schedule reviews using the FSRS algorithm through a self-hosted MCP server.3AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI clients to tutor students through a full learning workflow, including knowledge retrieval, assessments, mastery tracking, and personalized next-action recommendations.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal Leitner flashcard MCP server enabling AI clients to create decks, manage cards, study with spaced repetition, and track progress.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that helps you maintain a personal Japanese learning knowledge base, including vocabulary, confusion relations, mistakes, and spaced-repetition reviews. It provides tools and prompts for managing and reviewing your Japanese learning data without calling external LLM APIs.6-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that indexes exam PDFs and HTML documents for semantic search, topic frequency analysis, and study plan generation, fully local and private.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Tools are grouped by domain and mostly distinct, but paper_build and paper_deliver both generate papers (deliver additionally handles output/delivery), and kb_validate partially overlaps with kb_reconcile on ledger reconciliation, which could cause misselection.
All names use lower snake_case with consistent domain prefixes (kb_, review_, paper_, learn_, etc.), but the set mixes noun-based names (kb_overview, study_plan) and verb-based names (kb_search, review_grade), so it is not a strict verb_noun convention.
14 tools is well within the effective range, and each tool maps to a distinct operation in the study workflow without obvious redundancy or trivial filler.
The surface covers knowledge-base reading/search/validation, review cycles, planning, paper generation, and learning analytics, but lacks explicit tools for authoring/editing knowledge-base content and for managing wrong questions (add/clear), which are referenced by study_plan.