Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to kaoyan-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to act as a state-driven tutoring engine over MCP, with server-side mastery estimation, prerequisite checks, evidence-based assessment, and FSRS spaced review scheduling.
      58
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to create spaced-repetition flashcards from material being learned, quiz users aloud, grade answers, and schedule reviews using the FSRS algorithm through a self-hosted MCP server.
      3
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local Leitner flashcard MCP server enabling AI clients to create decks, manage cards, study with spaced repetition, and track progress.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that helps you maintain a personal Japanese learning knowledge base, including vocabulary, confusion relations, mistakes, and spaced-repetition reviews. It provides tools and prompts for managing and reviewing your Japanese learning data without calling external LLM APIs.
      6
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are grouped by domain and mostly distinct, but paper_build and paper_deliver both generate papers (deliver additionally handles output/delivery), and kb_validate partially overlaps with kb_reconcile on ledger reconciliation, which could cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lower snake_case with consistent domain prefixes (kb_, review_, paper_, learn_, etc.), but the set mixes noun-based names (kb_overview, study_plan) and verb-based names (kb_search, review_grade), so it is not a strict verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the effective range, and each tool maps to a distinct operation in the study workflow without obvious redundancy or trivial filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers knowledge-base reading/search/validation, review cycles, planning, paper generation, and learning analytics, but lacks explicit tools for authoring/editing knowledge-base content and for managing wrong questions (add/clear), which are referenced by study_plan.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues